| 刑事诉讼证据“事实论”辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐刚,汪永杰.刑事诉讼证据“事实论”辨析[J].安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,18(3):53-55. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐刚 汪永杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 安徽工业大学,文法学院,安徽,马鞍山,243002
2. 马鞍山市花山区,人民检察院,安徽,马鞍山,243000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑事诉讼实践表明,“事实论”不切合实事求是的证据制度的实质要求,未能真正反映和提示证据的本质属性,且“事实论”在对“证据”的定义上也存在瑕疵,由此造成了刑事诉讼证据理论与刑事诉讼实践的矛盾。刑事诉讼证据具有准真性、准联性、准信性的特点,它只能是可资采信的凭据。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事诉讼证据 “事实论” 可资采信 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7494(2001)03-0053-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年3月13日 |
Analysis of the "Facts" of Criminal Suit Proof |
| |
| Authors: | XU Gang WANG Yong-jie |
| |
| Abstract: | The practice of criminal suit shows that"facts"can not meet the essential needs of the proof system of being practical and realistic,nor can it reflect and show the nature of proof. And "facts"shows flaw in the definition of "evidence",resulting in the contradictions between the theory if criminal suit proof and the practice of it. The criminal suit proof has the characteristics of being authentic,linked and convincing. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal suit proof "facts" convincing |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
