首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Contesting public accountability: A dialogical exploration of accountability and social housing
Authors:Stewart Smyth
Affiliation:1. Schulich School of Business, York University, 4700 Keele Street, M3J 1P3, Canada;2. EGADE Business School, Carlos Lazo 100, Santa fe, 01389, Mexico City, Mexico;1. Faculté des sciences de l’administration, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6;2. Faculté des sciences de l’administration, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 6224, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6;3. Faculté des sciences de l’administration, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1543, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6;1. IÉSEG School of Management, (LEM-CNRS UMR 9221) 1 Parvis de la Défense, 92044 Paris La Défense Cedex, France;2. ESSEC Business School, 3 Avenue Bernard Hirsch, 95021 Cergy-Pontoise, France;1. The York Management School, University of York, United Kingdom;2. Essex Business School, University of Essex, United Kingdom
Abstract:This paper analyses the interaction between neoliberal inspired reforms of public services and the mechanisms for achieving public accountability. Where once accountability was exercised through the ballot box, now in the neoliberal age managerial and market based forms of accountability predominate. The analysis identifies resistance from civil society campaigns to the neoliberal restructuring of public services which leads to public accountability (PA) becoming a contested arena. To develop this analysis a re-theorisation of PA, as a relationship where civil society seeks to control the state, is explored in the context of social housing in England over the past thirty years. Central to this analysis is a dialogical analysis of key documents from a social housing regulator and civil society campaign. The analysis shows that the current PA practices are an outcome of both reforms from the government and resistance from civil society (in the shape of tenants’ campaigns). The outcome of which is to tell the story of the changes in PA (and accountability) centring on an analysis of discourse. Thus, the paper moves towards answering the question – what has happened to PA during the neoliberal age?
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号