首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

科技创新产业化模式的比较研究——以SRI、JITRI与揭榜挂帅为例
引用本文:葛沪飞,董若妍,谢欢,李政琎,成涵睿,白谦. 科技创新产业化模式的比较研究——以SRI、JITRI与揭榜挂帅为例[J]. 科技和产业, 2023, 23(3): 141-148
作者姓名:葛沪飞  董若妍  谢欢  李政琎  成涵睿  白谦
作者单位:东南大学 经济管理学院,南京 211189
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71602030);
摘    要:创新要素国际流动剧变及科技产业革命加速,创新驱动、自主可控等国家重大发展战略及产业转型升级需要本土科技创新的有力支撑,加速科技创新向产业创新转变。长期以来科技创新的产业需求和应用方式被视为已备条件而未被纳入产业化过程,这与实践形成巨大反差。为此,比较分析斯坦福国际研究院、江苏省产业技术研究院、揭榜挂帅等科技创新产业化的模式,探讨设置创新“搅拌器”进行科技创新的前瞻资源化机制,并提出相应的政策建议。

关 键 词:新型研发机构  科技创新  科技成果转化  揭榜挂帅

A Comparative Study on the Industrialization Mode of Scientific and Technological Innovation: Taking SRI,JITRI and enlisting and leading as an example
Abstract:The drastic changes in the international flow of innovation factors and the acceleration of the revolution of science and technology industry, innovation driven, independent and controllable and other major national development strategies and industrial transformation and upgrading urgently need the strong support of local scientific and technological innovation to accelerate the transformation from scientific and technological innovation to industrial innovation. For a long time, the industrial demand and application mode of scientific and technological innovation have been regarded as ready conditions and have not been included in the industrialization process, which is in great contrast to practice. modes of promoting the industrialization of scientific and technological innovation are compared and analyzed, such as Stanford International Research Institute (SRI), Jiangsu Industrial Technology Research Institute (JITRI) and Enlisting and Leading, the mechanism of setting up an innovation mixer are discusses to carry out the forward-looking resource utilization of scientific and technological innovation, so as to cross the valley of death of innovation, and corresponding policy suggestions are put forward.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《科技和产业》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技和产业》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号