首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Supplier adaptation: A qualitative investigation of customer and supplier perspectives
Institution:1. Department of Management, Farmer School of Business, MSC 1077, Miami University, 800 E. High St., Oxford, OH 45056, United States;2. Department of Supply Chain Management, WCOB 475, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States;1. East Carolina University, College of Business, 3102 Harold H. Bate Building, Greenville, NC 27858-4353, USA;2. University of Kentucky, 425N Gatton College of Business and Economics, Lexington, KY 40506-0034, USA;1. Bundeswehr University Munich, W. Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Munich, Germany;2. Department of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School, LA1 4YX Lancaster, UK;3. University of Bath, School of Management, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK;1. EM Normandie, 30 rue de Richelieu, 76600 Le Havre, France;2. Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Institute of Business Sciences, Department of Management and Corporate Economics, Magyar tudósok körútja 2. Building Q B 304, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary;3. Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, 1093 Budapest, Hungary;4. Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Management and Corporate Economics, Magyar tudósok körútja 2. Bldg. Q. Wing B, Floor 3. Room 307, H-117 Budapest, Hungary
Abstract:Differing views and goals in the buyer–supplier dyad can create underlying tension in supply chain relationships. Although research recognizes that adaptation is often expected from both customers and suppliers in exchange relationships, researchers have not adequately explored the long-range relational implications of customer adaptation requests. This research uses data from two qualitative focus groups to examine the interaction of customers and suppliers surrounding adaptation, as prior research has not yet considered how the customer's response to adaptation may change if they are aware of how the supplier actually perceives and evaluates specific adaptation requests. The first focus group included 20 active participants representing both customer and supplier perspectives, while the second focus group included five participants to provide a more in-depth examination of issues that emerged in the first focus group. Results suggest that customers' and suppliers' adaptation expectations differ; each has difficulty recognizing adaptation conflict because of perceived benefits and biases surrounding adaptation. Results suggest several adaptation conflict management behaviors are utilized to minimize its negative impacts on supply chain relationships, including blameshifting, justifying and negotiating techniques. Results suggest that trust can create blind spots in relationships, potentially causing customers and their suppliers to have difficulty recognizing conflict until it deteriorates relationships' foundational trust.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号