首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in the Workplace Under the ADA in the Wake of Sutton and Its Companions
Authors:Charles J. Coleman  Diane Cooney-Painter  Sukhjit K. Moonga
Affiliation:(1) School of Business, Rutgers University, Camden, New Jersey, 08102;(2) School of Business, Rutgers University, Camden, New Jersey, 08102
Abstract:The terms Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) or Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) refer to a neurological impairment that affects the individual's ability to sustain attention and to behave in a calm, rational manner.3Although this disorder has long been considered to be restricted to childhood, recent research has demonstrated that many children carry it over into adult life and take it with them into the workplace. Most U.S. courts have treated AD/HD as a disability covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).4However, in the summer of 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court made three decisions that will undoubtedly affect the future status of AD/HD and other impairments under the ADA. This article examines those decisions, how they affect the employment rights of AD/HD-afflicted employees, and the changes they will probably bring to litigation in this area. Because we have many reservations about the court's decisions, we not only voice our criticisms of the decisions, but also offer an alternative approach.
Keywords:Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder  Americans with Disabilities Act  U.S. Supreme Court decisions  employment discrimination  mitigation
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号