Do lucky CEOs avoid innovation? |
| |
Authors: | KwangJoo Koo Won Yong Kim |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Black School of Business, Pennsylvania State University - Behrend College, Erie, PA, USA;2. Department of Business Administration, Augsburg University, Minneapolis, MN, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Stock options are one of the most widely used equity-based compensation mechanisms to mitigate misalignment between managers’ and shareholders’ interests. And yet, it is sometimes suspiciously used as a method of extracting shareholders’ wealth to managers (Bebchuk et al., 2009). The typical ways to do so is using opportunistic timing such as backdating, spring-loading, etc. As shown in Bebchuk et al. (2010), opportunistic timing of option grants increases the incidence of lucky grants, or stock option grants that CEOs receive when the price is abnormally low. We investigate whether lucky grants to CEOs impact firm innovations and, by extension, long-term growth. Using patent citations as a proxy variable for innovation (Kogan et al., 2017), we find that innovation decreases if CEOs received lucky grant in the previous year. The results imply that lucky grants may reduce the incentive for CEOs to invest in risky, long-term projects and negatively affect fir innovation. |
| |
Keywords: | Executive compensation opportunistic timing innovation |
|
|