首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国科学院院士遴选效度评价研究
引用本文:王福涛,周丹丹,张振刚,杨红明.中国科学院院士遴选效度评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(11):108-113.
作者姓名:王福涛  周丹丹  张振刚  杨红明
作者单位:1.华南理工大学 公共管理学院;2.华南理工大学 工商管理学院,广东 广州 510641;3.广东财经大学 工商管理学院,广东 广州 510320
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目(14BGL119);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC630194,14YJC630159);中国博士后科学基金项目(2012M521609);广东省自然科学基金项目(2016A030313498)
摘    要:在政策文本内容分析的基础上,明晰中国科学院院士遴选目标与遴选标准变化过程,基于科学社会学的奖励系统理论,确定遴选效度评价指标并提出假设,以学部和相应学科为单位,统计分析1956—2015年国家自然科学奖全部获奖科研成果学科分布,以及中国科学院院士获得该奖项情况。验证假设发现,在以目前院士遴选目标为评价标准的情况下,中国科学院院士遴选效度良好,导致院士遴选制度存在缺陷的关键原因在于遴选目标的设置。藉此建议:重视分析院士国家自然科学奖获奖情况,以提高遴选效度评估的准确性;进一步强化国家科技奖励在院士遴选效度评估中的作用,设立总理科技顾问委员会以优化院士遴选目标。

关 键 词:院士遴选  国家自然科学奖  效度评价  
收稿时间:2016-10-24

A Study on the Selection Validity of Academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Wang Futao,Zhou Dandan,Zhang Zhengang,Yang Hongming.A Study on the Selection Validity of Academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2017,34(11):108-113.
Authors:Wang Futao  Zhou Dandan  Zhang Zhengang  Yang Hongming
Institution:1.School of Public Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China;2.School of Business Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China;3.School of Business Administration,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou 510320,China
Abstract:On the basis of policy text analysis,this paper defined the change process of selection criteria and objectives of Chinese Academy of Sciences,and then determined selection validity index and put forward hypothesis based on the theory of the sociology of science scientific reward system. In units of faculty and the corresponding subject,it analyzed the identity of National Natural Science Award Winners,as well as the aacademician who won the National Natural Science Award from 1956 to 2015,the result showed that linkage exists between the National Natural Science Award and the selection of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Under current academician selection target,member of Chinese academy of sciences selection validity is good,but it defects selection goal setting. Whereby we recommend attention to the analysis of Sciences National Natural Science Award,so as to improve the accuracy of the assessment of the validity of the selection and to further strengthen the influence of the national science and technology awards for the academician selection,the prime minister of science and technology advisory committee should be set up.
Keywords:Academician Selection  National Natural Science Award  Validity Assessment  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号