首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Differential default risk among traditional and non-traditional mortgage products and capital adequacy standards
Institution:1. Department of Quantitative Finance, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Sec. 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsin-Chu 30013, Taiwan;2. Department of Accounting and Finance, Southeastern Oklahoma State University, Durant, OK 74701, United States;3. Department of Economics and Finance, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States;4. Department and Graduate Institute of Finance, National Taipei College of Business, 321, Sec. 1, Jinan Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan
Abstract:We develop a framework to quantify credit risks of non-traditional mortgage products (NMPs). Ex ante probabilities of default are caused by willingness-to-pay and ability-to-pay problems and the high default rates for NMPs confirm that payment shock is a critical default risk indicator. Monte Carlo simulations are conducted using three correlated stochastic variables (mortgage interest rate, home price, and household income) under normal and stressed economies. Results confirm that the default risk of 2/28 and option ARM contracts requiring a minimum monthly interest payment have a greater probability of default than other mortgage products in all economic scenarios. Additionally, the credit risk of NMPs is primarily systematic risk, suggesting that these products should require higher risk-based capital. Due to the non-linear distribution of credit risk, even the advanced internal-based rating approach of the Basle II framework can understate the risk involved in these NMPs.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号