首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices
Authors:Brian Wu  Zhixi Wan  Daniel A. Levinthal
Affiliation:1. Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, , Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.;2. College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, , Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.;3. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Abstract:The issue of the failure of incumbent firms in the face of radical technical change has been a central question in the technology strategy domain for some time. We add to prior contributions by highlighting the role a firm's existing set of complementary assets have in influencing its investment in alternative technological trajectories. We develop an analytical model that considers firm heterogeneity with respect to both technological trajectories and complementary assets. Complementary assets play a dual role in incumbents' investment behavior toward radical technological change: they are not only resources (pipes) that can buffer firms from technology change, but also prisms through which firms view those changes, influencing both the magnitude of resources that should be invested and the trajectory to which these resources should be directed. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:radical technological change  incumbent failure  complementary assets  innovation incentives  technical trajectory
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号