| Abstract: | The Government has recognised that the balance of risks has shifted in the last six months. Even though the pound has been devalued by around 15 per cent and suspended from the ERM, the probability of a significant pick-up in inflation over the next 12 months is low: the more serious risk is that the recession, which showed signs of deepening in the third quarter, turns into a slump. It is for this reason that the Autumn Statement announced measures, both monetary and fiscal, to increase demand and more particularly to try to rebuild confidence which has taken a battering over more than two years of recession, most notably in the housing market, where in the immediate aftermath of the ERM diédâle prices continued their sharp fall. On the fiscal side the measures were constrained by a seriously adverse trend in the PSBR, with some imaginative use of ‘time-limited’ measures which will boost demand in the short run without adding to government borrowing in the medium term. On the monetary side the Chancellor sanctioned the third 1 percent reduction in interest rates since the pound has been in free float. He was responding partly to criticism that the earlier two cuts had achieved rather little, though Mi. Lamont might have been advised that steering the economy by monetary policy is akin to steering an oil tanker: it takes a considerable time to respond. The danger, especially if rates come down to 6 per cent before the end of the year or even, as some are urging, to Sper cent, is that rates will have to rise sharply again before the end of next year to head off a renewed bout of inflation. This may seem a remote possibility at the present time but, as Milton Friedman taught us long ago, the lags in monetary policy are long and variable: it is nonsense to imagine that the cuts in rates that we have seen in the last two months could have yet had any impact on the economy. The worry is that, with the pound I5 per cent down on ERM levels, they will have an adverse effect on inflation in, 1994-5. |
