Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model,efficiency and stability |
| |
Authors: | Thorsten Beck,Asli Demirgü ç -Kunt,Ouarda Merrouche |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. CentER, Department of Economics, Tilburg University and CEPR, The Netherlands;2. World Bank, Development Research Group, United States;3. European Securities and Markets Authority, Economic Research and Financial Stability Unit, France |
| |
Abstract: | How different are Islamic banks from conventional banks? Does the recent crisis justify a closer look at the Sharia-compliant business model for banking? When comparing conventional and Islamic banks, controlling for time-variant country-fixed effects, we find few significant differences in business orientation. There is evidence however, that Islamic banks are less cost-effective, but have a higher intermediation ratio, higher asset quality and are better capitalized. We also find large cross-country variation in the differences between conventional and Islamic banks as well as across Islamic banks of different sizes. Furthermore, we find that Islamic banks are better capitalized, have higher asset quality and are less likely to disintermediate during crises. The better stock performance of listed Islamic banks during the recent crisis is also due to their higher capitalization and better asset quality. |
| |
Keywords: | G21 G01 Z12 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|