对破坏森林资源犯罪刑事责任的实证分析

以11个破坏森林资源犯罪的判决为蓝本,运用实证研究的方法对其刑事责任进行分析。研究表明:司法机关对破坏森林资源犯罪案件的判决基本体现了罪刑相一致的原则,部分体现了恢复性司法的理念。针对判决中刑罚整体而言较重、在罚金和赔偿损失发生冲突时价值选择不明朗、植树造林判例太少、对破坏森林资源犯罪判处剥夺政治权利没有必要等问题,提出了解决问题的司法对策。

Empirical Analysis for Criminal Responsibility of Forest Resources Devastation Crime

According to 11 judgments of forest resources devastation crime as the original version,we have analyzed their criminal responsibility by empirical research.Through the research,we can find that the decisions of judicial authority,to forest resources devastation crime,embody the principle-crime and punishment is compatible,and some parts reflect the concept of restorative justice.In connection with these problems:relatively heavy regarding penalty overall in the judgment,value chosen unclearly during the conflict between fine and standing the loss,few legal precedent of planting trees and whether need to deprive the political rights when sentencing forest resources devastation crime,we propose some judicial countermeasures to solve these problems.