对中国与CISG有关声明中若干理论问题的研究

就中国与CISG有关声明而言:首先,中国"非书面形式规定保留"的真正对象是CISG第11条、第29条和第二部分(第15条第2款和第22条除外)。之所以排除第15条第2款和第22条,是因为尽管其允许"发价的撤回"和"接受的撤回"得以非书面形式作出,但逻辑上并不允许"发价"和"接受"的意旨表示可以非书面形式作出。其次,无论是根据《香港通知函》和《澳门通知函》的规定,还是对CISG第93条作字面意思理解或作扩大理解,CISG对香港和澳门不适用。最后,尽管中国撤回对CISG所作相关保留会导致相关货物销售合同(包括其形式)法律适用的变化,亦应撤回相关保留。法律适用的变化是撤回相关保留之果,而非其因。

Research on Several Theoretical Problems in Chinese CISG-related Declarations

So far as the CISG-related declarations of China are concerned,firstly,the real object of the Chinese "res ervation of non-writing form provision" is Article 11,Article 29 and Part 2 of CISG(excluding Paragraph 2 of Article 15 and Article 22).The reason for excluding Paragraph 2 of Article 15 and Article 22 is that although they allow the "withdrawal of offer" and "withdrawal of acceptance" to be made by non-writing form,they don't allowthe indication of intention of "offer" and "acceptance" to be made by n...