A Comparative Analysis of Multilateral Environmental Negotiations |
| |
Authors: | Pamela Chasek |
| |
Institution: | (1) Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 212 East 47th Street, Apt. 21F, New York, NY, 10017 |
| |
Abstract: | Global environmental problems pose important diplomatic and legal challenges to the international community. The nature of these problems requires an unprecedented degree of international cooperation that is achieved through multilateral negotiation, which is often shaped by scientific uncertainty, the complexity of the issues, and the wide range of actors and interests. One way of analyzing and explaining this complicated process is through the use of comparative analysis. By breaking down the negotiating process into a series of phases and turning points, it becomes easier to analyze the roles of different actors, the management of issues, the formation of groups and coalitions, and the art of consensus building. This article uses comparative analysis to characterize, develop, and specify a model of the multilateral environmental negotiation process. The model is elaborated upon inductively through a comparative analysis of eleven cases of multilateral environmental negotiations. Statistical techniques are used to determine whether there is any relationship among attributes of the process (within the phases or at the turning points) and between these characteristics and outcomes. |
| |
Keywords: | multilateral environmental negotiation process analysis United Nations comparative analysis |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|