| Abstract: | According to the reports in the past decade, some Asian subcontractors, mainly Taiwan, Hong Kong and Korea transnational corporations, tend to be labor abusive in their overseas investment destinations like China or Southeast Asia. Taking Vietnam as an example, this paper raises questions as to why Taiwanese transnational companies can control workplace unions in a trade-union-supportive regime. Given the government s constraint of political rights, and the individualized workplace unions, the function of trade unions in Vietnam is destined to be limited. The trade unions turn out be an arm of management, rather than representing workers interests in these transnational companies. This article also explores the influence of the newly developed  codes of conducts from Western buyers. In the survey of three companies which are required to follow the codes of conduct by buyers, trade unions had no more freedom than those in companies without codes of conduct. The paper discusses the implications of this research, offering strategies for labor rights improvements.Hong-zen Wang is the director of the Graduate Institute of Southeast Asian Studies at the National Chi Nan University, Taiwan. A sociologist, he has written widely on Asian labor and class issues. The most recent article  The Impact of the State on Workers Conditions–Comparing Taiwanese Factories in China and Vietnam will be published in Pacific Affairs. His current research interests include industrial relations in Taiwan-owned or partially owned factories in Vietnam and the impact of global anti-sweatshop movement on the third world factories. |
