首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Climate change,urban energy and planning practices: Italian experiences of innovation in land management tools
Affiliation:1. CONACYT – Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), Carretera México-Toluca 3655, 01210, Mexico City, Mexico;2. EQUIDE, Universidad Iberoamericana (IBERO), Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 880, C.P. 01219, Mexico City, Mexico;3. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 79 JFK Street, Mailbox 117, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States;4. Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, 14 Prince’s Gardens, London SW7 1NA, United Kingdom;5. Independent Consultant, Mexico City, Mexico;6. College of Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), United States;1. CERIS—Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049/001 Lisbon, Portugal;2. CICS, NOVA—Interdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences, Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, New University of Lisbon, Avenida de Berna, 26-C, 1069-061, Lisbon, Portugal;3. CIAUD—Research Centre for Architecture, Urbanism and Design, Faculty of Architecture, University of Lisbon, Rua Sá Nogueira, Pólo Universitário, Alto da Ajuda, 1349-055 Lisbon, Portugal
Abstract:Climate change and energy saving are challenging the city and the territorial organization. Innovative spatial and urban planning methods and procedures are required, and new approaches and instruments must be elaborated and applied in order to shift from the building scale to the urban and territorial ones. In fact, while energy saving and emission control measures are usually applied to single buildings, plants and technological systems, the urban and territorial scales are not fully considered, although energy consumption and greenhouse gases reduction are connected to the urban form and density, to activities allocation, to mobility, etc., thus involving spatial and land-use planning decisions. It is therefore urgent to overcome the divide between energy and urban planning by elaborating and using new implementation tools. In general, the usual top-down, public-led actions are no longer politically and economically viable, whereas new methods based on public–private partnerships are being progressively adopted. This is a major change, which may set new objectives for planning practices in terms of urban quality, equity, and energy efficiency. This perspective requires redefinition of the usual methods for development rights assignment, and the activation of new planning procedures based on the assessment of actions in terms of performance instead of conformance to pre-defined rules. The expected results regard a more efficient land market and better performing development (or re-development) choices.The article focuses on the Italian case and analyzes the possibility of integrating energy planning with spatial planning, the effectiveness of plan implementation mechanisms, and the prospect of integrate public-led interventions with market tools. Recent innovations in the legislative framework support the inclusion of energy saving and climate change adaptation and mitigation goals in plan implementation procedures.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号