首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

单位对科技成果法定范围、权属主体的限制解释
引用本文:冷必元,王瑞玲. 单位对科技成果法定范围、权属主体的限制解释[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(13): 118-124. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2018010258
作者姓名:冷必元  王瑞玲
作者单位:湖南工业大学法学院,湖南株洲,412000;湖南工业大学法学院,湖南株洲412000;西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120
基金项目:湖南省教育科学“十二五”规划项目(XJK015QGD004);湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会项目(XSP18YBC102)
摘    要:高等院校、科研院所容易扩张科技成果认定权,对单位科技成果的范围、权属主体作出扩张解释。单位的扩张解释态度,有其政策与法律依据,但是,过度扩张解释容易导致科技成果虚报和科技成果造假,从而挫伤研发者的科研积极性和创造性。实务操作中,科研单位科技管理部门对科技成果的认定,既应当受到不允许类推解释的限制,又应当受到同行专家审查的限制。在职务科技成果认定中,应当对《促进科技成果转化法》第2条所规定的任务标准、资源标准进行限制解释,合理限缩职务科技成果认定范围。

关 键 词:科技成果  法定范围  权属主体  限制解释
收稿时间:2018-06-12

On the Limited Interpretation of the Legal Scope and the Subject of Ownership of the Scientific and Technological Achievements by the Unit
Leng Biyuan,Wang Ruiling. On the Limited Interpretation of the Legal Scope and the Subject of Ownership of the Scientific and Technological Achievements by the Unit[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(13): 118-124. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2018010258
Authors:Leng Biyuan  Wang Ruiling
Affiliation:(1.Law School,Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412000,China;2.Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120,China)
Abstract:Colleges and universities, scientific research institutes to expand scientific and technological achievements that right, the scope of the unit of scientific and technological achievements, the ownership do expansion explanation. Unit's expansion explanation has its policy and legal basis, but easily lead to excessive expansion of interpretation of scientific and technological achievements of scientific and technological achievements of false fraud, thus undermining developers enthusiasm for scientific research. In practice, science and technology management department identified scientific research units of scientific and technological achievements, should have not allowed the analogy to explain the restrictions should be subject to peer review restrictions. In the identification of the scientific and technological achievements of the post, the scientific and technological achievements should be constracted and the scope of the identification of the achievements of the post should be limited.
Keywords:Scientific and Technological Achievements  Legal Scope  Weight Subject  Restrictive Interpretation  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号