首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

可占有性战略、技术柔性与主导设计形成:比较案例研究
引用本文:李冬梅,刘维奇,宋志红.可占有性战略、技术柔性与主导设计形成:比较案例研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(11):1-8.
作者姓名:李冬梅  刘维奇  宋志红
作者单位:山西大学 数学科学学院;山西大学 管理与决策研究所,山西 太原 030006;山西财经大学 财政金融学院,山西 太原 030006;山西大学 管理与决策研究所,山西 太原,030006
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究项目(17YJC630055)
摘    要:基于企业层面和技术层面双重视角,以激光光盘行业BD、HD DVD和移动操作系统Android、iOS的标准竞争作为比较案例,考察了技术发起者可占有性战略如何影响主导设计形成。研究发现:①技术发起者对技术标准采取更加开放的战略,一方面有助于吸引更多组件生产商,扩大标准联盟规模并提高标准联盟多元性,另一方面,技术发起者鼓励组件生产商参与技术标准开发与商业化,有助于改进技术标准,而技术标准性能改善将进一步吸引更多组件生产商。标准联盟规模与标准联盟多元性之间的自我强化效应最终促进主导设计形成;②技术柔性不仅受到可占有性战略的影响,也受到技术发起者在标准开发过程中所确立的技术规范内在特征的影响。柔性程度较高的技术标准往往能够得到更多改进,从而有助于弥补特定技术标准存在的初始设计缺陷。

关 键 词:主导设计  可占有性战略  技术柔性  标准联盟  技术优势
收稿时间:2019-01-24

Appropriability Strategy,Technology Flexibility and the Emergence of Dominant Designs:A Comparative Case Study
Li Dongmei,Liu Weiqi,Song Zhihong.Appropriability Strategy,Technology Flexibility and the Emergence of Dominant Designs:A Comparative Case Study[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2019,36(11):1-8.
Authors:Li Dongmei  Liu Weiqi  Song Zhihong
Institution:(1.School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanxi University;2.Institute of Management and Decision, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;3.Faculty of Finance and Banking, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)
Abstract:Based on the firm level and technology level perspectives, the article takes the comparative case study on BD vs. HD DVD in the compact disc industry and Android vs. iOS in mobile operating system industry and investigates how technology sponsors’ appropriability strategy affects the emergence of dominant designs. The case analyses show that, on the one hand, the more open strategy by technology sponsors may attract more component providers which contributes to enlarging the size and diversity of standard alliances, thereby increases the likelihood of the emergence of dominant designs; on the other hand, encouraging component providers to participate in the development and commercialization of technology standard may also contribute to the improvements on technology standard, which in turn may attract more component providers. The self reinforcing effects between size and diversity of standard alliances may eventually lead to the emergence of dominant designs; technology flexibility may not only be influenced by appropriability strategy, but also by the inherent characteristics of technology specifications established by technology sponsors in standard development process. The higher level of technology flexibility means more revisions and improvements, which may compensate for the initial design shortcomings with specific technology standard.
Keywords:Dominant Design  Appropriability Strategy  Technology Flexibility  Standard Alliances  Technology Superiority  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号