Security Deposits, Adverse Selection and Office Leases |
| |
Authors: | John D Benjamin James D Shilling C F Sirmans |
| |
Institution: | The American University, Washington, DC, 20016-8044;University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1397;University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2041 |
| |
Abstract: | Our focus in this article is on the extent to which security deposits allow landlords to contract on the intensity with which tenants utilize office space. Much existing discussion recognizes that landlords expect some tenants to be more opportunistic than others, but that landlords often cannot predict a tenant's future behavior. As a consequence, landlords will charge all tenants, both low-utilization and high-utilization ones, a rental externality premium. This rental externality premium gives low-utilization tenants (or tenants with better credit quality than the market perceives) a strong incentive to sort themselves out. Our findings suggest that office rental contracts with large up-front security deposits are one way in which different tenant types can sort themselves out. Such contracts reduce landlord uncertainty and imply rental discounts in excess of the foregone interest on the deposit monies. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|