首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Security Deposits, Adverse Selection and Office Leases
Authors:John D Benjamin  James D Shilling  C F Sirmans
Institution:The American University, Washington, DC, 20016-8044;University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1397;University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2041
Abstract:Our focus in this article is on the extent to which security deposits allow landlords to contract on the intensity with which tenants utilize office space. Much existing discussion recognizes that landlords expect some tenants to be more opportunistic than others, but that landlords often cannot predict a tenant's future behavior. As a consequence, landlords will charge all tenants, both low-utilization and high-utilization ones, a rental externality premium. This rental externality premium gives low-utilization tenants (or tenants with better credit quality than the market perceives) a strong incentive to sort themselves out. Our findings suggest that office rental contracts with large up-front security deposits are one way in which different tenant types can sort themselves out. Such contracts reduce landlord uncertainty and imply rental discounts in excess of the foregone interest on the deposit monies.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号