Accruals Quality, Information Risk and Cost of Capital: Evidence from Australia |
| |
Authors: | Philip Gray Ping-Sheng Koh Yen H . Tong |
| |
Affiliation: | The authors are respectively from UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Australia;Department of Accounting, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong;and Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. They are grateful for the comments and suggestions of an anonymous referee, Peter F. Pope (editor), Neil Fargher, Egon Kalotay, Michael O'Brien and seminar participants at Macquarie University. |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract: Recent theoretical work argues that information risk is a non-diversifiable risk factor that is priced in the capital market. Using accruals quality to proxy for information risk, Francis et al. (2005) provide empirical support for this argument using a sample of US firms. This paper re-examines the interplay of accruals quality, information risk and cost of capital in Australia, where a number of important institutional and regulatory differences are hypothesized to affect the relation between accruals quality and cost of capital. The results suggest that, while accruals quality impacts on the cost of capital for Australian firms, some salient differences exist. In contrast to findings for US firms, the costs of debt and equity for Australian firms are largely influenced by accruals quality arising from economic fundamentals (i.e., innate accrual quality) but not discretionary reporting choices (i.e., discretionary accrual quality). This finding is consistent with our predictions based on the Australian institutional and regulatory environment. In addition, using both the asset pricing tests in Francis et al. (2005) and Core et al. (2008) , we provide evidence consistent with accruals quality being a priced risk factor. |
| |
Keywords: | accruals quality information risk cost of capital information asymmetry information precision discretionary innate |
|
|