首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论惩罚性违约金的效力
引用本文:黄秋娜. 论惩罚性违约金的效力[J]. 兰州商学院学报, 2009, 25(6): 122-126
作者姓名:黄秋娜
作者单位:南阳师范学院,法学院,河南,南阳,473061
摘    要:违约金的性质问题素有争议,其核心是惩罚性违约金的效力。惩罚性违约金具有惩罚和预防功能,其支付不以损害的发生为前提,无论根据诚实信用原则、意思自治原则,还是从维护交易秩序出发,都应该确认惩罚性违约金的效力。但惩罚性违约金不应被滥用,其应受到规制。

关 键 词:惩罚性违约金  赔偿性违约金  诚实信用原则  意思自治原则

On Validity of Punitive Liquidated Damages
HUNAG Qiuna. On Validity of Punitive Liquidated Damages[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College, 2009, 25(6): 122-126
Authors:HUNAG Qiuna
Affiliation:HUNAG Qiu - na ( Department of Law, Nan-Yang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, China)
Abstract:There have been always disputes on the nature of liquidated damages. The whether the punitive liquidated damages are valid or not. The punitive liquidated main problem is damages have functions of punishing and preventing the breach of the contract. Claiming the punitive liquidated damages doesn ' t need to prove the existence of damages. The court or arbitral organization should confirm the validity of punitive liquidated damages weather on the base of principle of fidelity or the freedom of contract, and it is also necessary to maintain the order of deals. However, in order to prevent from being abused, the punitive damages should be regulated.
Keywords:punitive liquidated damages  compensative liquidated damages  principle of fidelity  principle of the freedom of contract
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号