EPR履行的产品回收模式比较及其选择

通过生产者承担直接责任的OEM回收、生产者社团共享责任的共同回收和产品责任提供者的第三方回收三种生产者扩展责任(Extended Producer Responsibility,EPR)履行模式的分析和比较,从中发现对于许多处在寿命周期末(End-of-Life,EOL)产品来说,第三种EPR履行模式需要通过签定协议且假定第三方代表生产者承担产品寿命周期末责任的模式,方能满足EPR最有效的方式.为了使第三方回收模式更有效地履行生产者扩展责任,国家需颁布一些恰当的特别规则和法规,同时每种EPR履行的产品回收模式的合法实施,都应该是定义明确的可遵循的规则.

Comparison and Choice on Recycling Mode Performed by EPR

Through analyzing and comparing the performing mode of three Extended Producer Responsibilities(EPRs)-OEM recycling by the producer,joint recycling by the producer community sharing responsibility,and the third party recycling by the provider,this paper finds out that for many products in End-of-Life(EOL),the third EPR mode can reach the most effective one only if the contract is signed and provided that the third party represents producer to take the responsibility of EOL.So in order to make the third part...