Protectionism, Intellectual Property, and Consumer Protection: Was the Uruguay Round Good for Consumers?

Critics of the Uruguay Round of the GATT have contended that its provisions threaten the ability of individual nations to enact and keep in place strong consumer protection measures. Agreements regarding non-discriminatory treatment and protection of intellectual property, critics believe, undermine important consumer policies designed to promote consumer health, safety, and information. This paper reviews the arguments and evidence regarding the potential of the Uruguay Round agreements to threaten consumer protection. Although the potential for such threats does exist, the record to date does not suggest any significant retreat from consumer protection due to free trade agreements.