首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Bush v. Gore and the Effect of New Source Review on Power Plant Emissions
Authors:Ian Lange  Joshua Linn
Institution:(1) National Center for Environmental Economics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, MC 1809T, Washington, DC 20460, USA;(2) Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2102UH, MC 144, 601 South Morgan St., Chicago, IL 60607-7121, USA
Abstract:New Source Review (NSR) is a Clean Air Act regulation that requires electric utilities to meet emission standards when making modifications to existing power plants. The regulation increases the cost of replacing worn out parts, and limits the firm’s scope of potential capital investments. Such restrictions may lead to greater retirements and lower utilization, adversely affecting profits. Prior to the 2000 presidential election, investors expected Bush to have a narrower interpretation of NSR than Gore. Therefore, we use changes in stock prices to estimate the effect on profits of differences in NSR policy. Our results indicate that investors expected the average boiler to be $38 million more valuable under the Bush administration. Over the boilers’ lifetimes, the additional utilization will have increased emissions by 19 million tons of sulfur dioxide, 5.9 million tons of nitrogen oxides and 980 million tons of carbon dioxide, relative to natural gas generation.
Keywords:Event window  New source review  Coal power plants  Air pollution
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号