首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Market reforms in the time of imbalance
Institution:1. HEC Montréal, Institute of Applied Economics, 3000, chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada;2. International Monetary Fund, 700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431, USA;3. North Carolina State University, Department of Economics, 2801 Founders Drive, 4150 Nelson Hall, Box 8110, 27695-8110 Raleigh, NC, USA;4. Department of Economics, University of Washington, Savery Hall, Box 353330, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;5. CEPR, UK;6. EABCN, Germany;7. NBER, USA;1. Vanderbilt University and NBER;1. Alfred-Weber-Institute for Economics, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 58, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany;2. Oesterreichische Nationalbank (OeNB), Sensengasse 2, 1090 Wien, Austria;3. Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Wien, Austria;1. School of Foreign Service in Qatar, Georgetown University, United States;2. University of Pittsburgh, United States;3. University of Minnesota, United States;4. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, United States;5. National Bureau of Economic Research, United States;6. Pennsylvania State University, United States;1. Department of Economics, Binghamton University, PO Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, United States of America;2. FDIC, Center for Financial Research, 550 17th St NW, Washington, DC 20429, United States of America
Abstract:We study the consequences of product and labor market reforms in a two-country model with endogenous producer entry and labor market frictions. We focus on the role of business cycle conditions and external constraints at the time of reform implementation (or of a credible commitment to it) in shaping the dynamic effects of such policies. Product market reform is modeled as a reduction in entry costs and takes place in a non-traded sector that produces services used as input in manufacturing production. Labor market reform is modeled as a reduction in firing costs and/or unemployment benefits. We find that business cycle conditions at the time of deregulation significantly affect adjustment. A reduction of firing costs entails larger and more persistent adverse short-run effects on employment and output when implemented in a recession. By contrast, a reduction in unemployment benefits boosts employment and output by more in a recession compared to normal times. The impact of product market reforms is less sensitive to business cycle conditions. Credible announcements about future reforms induce sizable short-run dynamics, regardless of whether the announcement takes place in normal times or during an economic downturn. Whether the immediate effect is expansionary or contractionary varies across reforms. Finally, lack of access to international lending in the wake of reform can amplify the costs of adjustment.
Keywords:Business cycle  External borrowing constraint  Labor market  Product market  Structural reforms
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号