首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

吴敬梓研究文章中存在的编校问题——以万方数据跨库检索近三年文章为例
引用本文:李应青.吴敬梓研究文章中存在的编校问题——以万方数据跨库检索近三年文章为例[J].铜陵学院学报,2014(6):91-94.
作者姓名:李应青
作者单位:滁州学院,安徽滁州239000
基金项目:安徽省高校人文社科重点研究基地招标项目“明清以来江淮分水岭区域综合治理研究”(SK2014A063).
摘    要:细读万方数据跨库检索的近三年来各类期刊刊发的吴敬梓研究文章,发现存在一些编校问题,归纳为六个方面:(1)错,即错别字、错标点、错页码;(2)混,即作者在同一篇文章中所叙述的史料混乱或同一史料标注混乱;(3)歧,即歧义;(4)漏,即漏字、漏标点符号;(5)多,即多字、多标点符号;(6)省,即省略。出现原因源于:(1)拿来主义;(2)学术功底不扎实;(3)学术态度不严谨;(4)技术层面问题。为此提出了一些编校建议,以期引起从事吴敬梓研究的学者和编校们的关注,精益求精,进一步提升吴敬梓研究文章的质量。

关 键 词:吴敬梓  研究文章  问题

Editing Mistakes in the Researching Articles on Wu Jingzi——A Case Study of Recent three-year Articles Based on Wangfang Data
Li Ying-qing.Editing Mistakes in the Researching Articles on Wu Jingzi——A Case Study of Recent three-year Articles Based on Wangfang Data[J].Journal of Tongling College,2014(6):91-94.
Authors:Li Ying-qing
Institution:Li Ying-qing (Chuzhou University,Chuzhou Anhui 239000,China)
Abstract:Based on cross-database searching in Chinainfo, researching articles on Wu Jingzi in recent three years are taken and read in detail in which some editorial mistakes could be easily found. They are listed as the following six aspects: mistakes, confusion, ambiguity, missing, redundancy and omission. These problems mainly originate from copinism, weak academic ability, blundering academic attitude and technical matters. This article puts forward some suggestions to arouse attention and emphases for researchers and editors on the study of Wu Jingzi so as to improve the quality of the related research.
Keywords:Wu Jingzi  researching articles  editorial mistakes
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号