首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Compulsory versus voluntary voting: An experimental study
Institution:1. Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, PA, United States;2. Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan;1. University of Georgia, USA;2. Georgia State University, USA
Abstract:We report on an experiment comparing compulsory and voluntary voting institutions in a voting game with common preferences. Rational choice theory predicts sharp differences in voter behavior between these two institutions. If voting is compulsory, then voters may find it rational to vote insincerely, i.e., against their private information. If voting is voluntary so that abstention is allowed, then sincere voting in accordance with a voter's private information is always rational while participation may become strategic. We find strong support for these theoretical predictions in our experimental data. Moreover, voters adapt their decisions to the voting institution in place in such a way as to make the group decision accuracy differences between the two voting institutions negligible. The latter finding may serve to rationalize the co-existence of compulsory and voluntary voting institutions in nature.
Keywords:Voting behavior  Voting mechanisms  Condorcet Jury model  Information aggregation  Laboratory experiments
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号