| 无偿收回国有土地使用权法律分析——评我国《城市房地产管理法》第25条 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙静,苟蓝月.无偿收回国有土地使用权法律分析——评我国《城市房地产管理法》第25条[J].沈阳工程学院学报(社会科学版),2007,3(2):229-231. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙静 苟蓝月 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 海南大学,法学院,海口,570228 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国《城市房地产管理法》第25条关于国有土地使用权因闲置无偿收回的惩罚性规定并不合理,国有土地使用权出让合同的性质应该是民事合同,以此为基础,界定闲置土地上的权利,建立相应的责任体系,更合理的达到防止公权力的滥用,保护私权的目的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 国有土地使用权 行政合同 闲置土地 违约责任 公权 |
| 文章编号： | 24414265 |
| 修稿时间： | 10 15 2006 12:00AM |
Legal analysis on taking back the right to use the state-owned land without payment——Commenting on the 25th item in Urban Real Estate Administration Law |
| |
| SUN Jing,GOU Lan-yue.Legal analysis on taking back the right to use the state-owned land without payment——Commenting on the 25th item in Urban Real Estate Administration Law[J].Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering:Social Sciences,2007,3(2):229-231. |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Jing GOU Lan-yue |
| |
| Institution: | School of Law, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The regulation about taking back the right to use state-owned land without payment because of idleness in the 25th item in China's Urban Real Estate Administration Law is not reasonable.Contract property of assigning the right to use the state-owned land should be civil contract,we should take this as basis,define the right of idle land,set up corresponding responsibility system,so as to prevent the abuse of public right more reasonably,protect the private right. |
| |
| Keywords: | right to use the state-owned land administrative contract idle land responsibility of breaking contract public right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
