Complex ballot propositions,individual voting behavior,and status quo bias |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. University of Konstanz, Department of Economics, Box 138, 78457 Konstanz, Germany;2. IFO Institute, Center for the Economics of Education, Munich, Germany;1. ITAM, Mexico;2. Princeton University, USA;1. Paris School of Business, 59 Rue Nationale, 75013, Paris, France;2. University of York, UK;1. Universitat de les Illes Balears, Departament d''Economia Aplicada, Palma de Mallorca, 07122, Spain;2. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK;3. Western University, Department of Economics, London, Ontario, N6G 2V4, Canada;4. CESIfo, Germany;5. University of Birmingham, Department of Economics, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK;6. CEPR, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | One concern about direct democracy is that citizens may not be sufficiently competent to decide about complex policies. This may lead to exaggerated conservatism in the voting decision (status quo bias). To investigate how complexity affects individual voting behavior, we develop a novel measure of proposition complexity (using official pre-referendum booklets) and combine it with post-referendum survey data from Switzerland. Using Heckman selection estimations to account for endogenous variation in participation rates, we find that an increase in proposition complexity from the 10th to the 90th percentile would decrease voters' approval by 5.6 ppts, which is often decisive: an additional 12% of the propositions in our sample would be rejected. |
| |
| Keywords: | Voting behavior Proposition complexity Direct democracy Status quo bias Heckman probit model |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
