首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Quantity-cum-quality contests
Institution:1. ITAM, Mexico;2. Princeton University, USA;1. Baugh Center for Entrepreneurship & Free Enterprise, Baylor University, USA;2. Department of Economics, Clemson University, USA;1. Département des Sciences Économiques, ESG-UQAM, Montréal, Canada;2. CESifo, Germany;3. CORE, Belgium;4. Universidad de los Andes, School of Government, Colombia;5. CORE, Université de Louvain, Belgium;6. CREPP, Université de Liège, Belgium;7. Toulouse School of Economics, France;1. University of Magdeburg, Halle Institute for Economic Research, Germany;2. Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), Germany;3. University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle Institute for Economic Research, Germany
Abstract:Quality and quantity are very common features of production processes. People care about these two features and they tend to be connected. I consider a contest in which the quantity and quality of output are rewarded. The output in the quality contest plays a dual role. It counts in the quality contest but it is also converted into quantity-equivalent output to obtain total output in the quantity contest. This latter feature implies that the two contests are interlinked. I find that when the unit cost of producing quality is sufficiently high, then treating quality and quantity as the same has a disincentive effect on the production of quality. In contrast, when the unit cost of producing quality is sufficiently low, treating quality and quantity as the same has no disincentive effect on the production of quality. I also find an equilibrium in which no one exerts effort in the quantity contest. When there is a binding budget constraint on effort, I find that effort in the quantity contest is smaller relative to the unconstrained case but effort in the quality contest may remain unchanged.
Keywords:Bayesian Nash equilibrium  Contests  Quality  Quantity  D72
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号