首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Climate policy vs. agricultural productivity shocks in a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling framework: The case of a developing economy
Institution:1. Australian Centre for Biosecurity and Environmental Economics, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Australia;2. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Australia;1. Economic Development Initiatives (EDI) Limited, 38 Crendon Street, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP13 6LA, United Kingdom;2. School of Economics & CERDI - UMR CNRS 6587, Université Clermont Auvergne, 65, bd François Mitterrand, 63 009 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France;3. Ministry of the Economy, Planning and Regional Development of Cameroon, DPPP/DGEPIP/MINEPAT, BP 660, Yaoundé, Cameroon;1. The World Bank;2. International Food Policy Research Institute;1. Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, 310 West Campus Drive, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;2. Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada;3. New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, 850 Lincoln Road, Fredericton, NB E3B 9H8, Canada
Abstract:The main objective of this paper is to compare the cost of climate policy consistent with the 2 °C global warming target (Paris Agreement target) with the cost of climate change induced agricultural productivity shocks, using a recursive dynamic CGE model for India. The social cost of carbon, in terms of loss in agriculture sector, is estimated to be about 2 percent of GDP, at zero rate of discount, under conservative forecasts of fall in agricultural productivity. In comparison, the cost of climate policy consistent with the Paris Agreement target of 2 °C is about 1 percent of GDP. Thus, there is a strong case for the adoption of ambitious climate policy in India, provided other countries also adhere to the same. Besides, revenues generated from the carbon tax and emission allowance could be a means to support the development and adoption of new energy and agricultural technologies, to increase social sector expenditure and to reduce abatement costs.
Keywords:Social cost of carbon  Climate policy  Agriculture  CGE model  India  Q54  Q52  Q56  D58
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号