When mandatory disclosure hurts: Expert advice and conflicting interests |
| |
Authors: | Ming Li Kristóf Madarász |
| |
Institution: | a Department of Economics, Concordia University, 1455 Boul. de Maisonneuve O., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8 b Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley, 549 Evans Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA |
| |
Abstract: | We study the quality of advice that an informed and biased expert gives to an uninformed decision maker. We compare two scenarios: mandatory disclosure of the bias and nondisclosure, where information about the bias can only be revealed through cheap-talk. We find that in many scenarios nondisclosure allows for higher welfare for both parties. Hiding the bias allows for more precise communication for the more biased type and, if different types are biased in different directions, may allow for the same for the less biased type. We identify contexts where equilibrium revelation allows but mandatory disclosure prevents meaningful communication. |
| |
Keywords: | C72 D83 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|