基于CiteSpace的生态系统服务与人类福祉的关系研究

目的 为了追踪和探索生态系统服务与人类福祉之间的趋势与热点，了解其研究进展，为未来的相关研究提供新思路。方法 文章基于CiteSpace软件及文献计量学分析方法，以CSSCI与CSCD数据库为来源，从生态系统服务、人类福祉、生态系统服务—人类福祉三方面，系统地分析了国内生态系统服务与人类福祉之间的研究现状与热点趋势，总结了二者之间复杂关系的研究进展，并指出未来的研究方向。结果 （1）生态系统服务领域的文献量较多，研究热点及方向较广泛，主要集中在功能与价值评估、土地利用、生态补偿等方面，但缺少对大尺度区域复合生态系统服务的评估研究且评估方法的科学性有待加强。（2）人类福祉领域的文献量较少，研究范围较局限，研究热点主要集中在与生态系统服务的关系与福祉评估，在此基础上还应多角度探究人类福祉的影响因素及福祉评估方法的准确性。（3）生态系统服务—人类福祉领域的研究成果较少，研究内容不够深入，研究方法的科学性有待提高。结论 该研究深入探索了当前生态服务与人类福祉的研究热点及进展，对未来学者完善该领域的研究提供参考意义。

RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND HUMAN WELL-BEING BASED ON CITESPACE

This research aims to track and explore the trends and hotspots between ecosystem services and human well-being. Based on Citespace software and bibliometric analysis method, this study took CSSCI and CSCD database as sources, and from three aspects of ecosystem services, human well-being, and ecosystem services- human well-being, it systematically analyzed the research status and hot trends of the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being in China, then summarized the research progress of the complex relationship between the two, and pointed out the future research direction. The results were showed as follows. (1) There were a large number of literatures in the field of ecosystem services, with a wide range of research hotspots and directions, mainly focusing on function and value assessment, land use, ecological compensation, etc., but there was a lack of evaluation research on large-scale regional complex ecosystem services, and the scientific nature of evaluation methods needed to be strengthened.(2) There were few literatures in the field of human well-being, and the research scope was relatively limited. The research focus mainly focused on the relationship with ecosystem services and well-being assessment. On this basis, the influencing factors of human well-being and the accuracy of well-being assessment methods should be explored from multiple perspectives. (3) There were few research achievements in the field of ecosystem services-human welfare, the research content was not deep enough, and the scientific research methods needed to be improved. It concludes that this study deeply explores the current research hotspot and progress of ecological services and human well-being, and provides references for future scholars to improve the research in this field.