首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国土地科学学科范式框架构建研究
引用本文:严金明,夏方舟.中国土地科学学科范式框架构建研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(2):30-37.
作者姓名:严金明  夏方舟
作者单位:1.中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京 100872;2.剑桥大学土地经济系,剑桥 CB3 9EP
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(09&ZD047);国土资源部公益性行业科研专项课题(201211028);“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAB11B02)。
摘    要:研究目的:定义科学范式的内涵,构建中国土地科学学科范式框架,显化中国土地科学学科范式,以推动学科建设和发展。研究方法:文献研究法,比较分析法,案例研究法。研究结果:土地科学学科范式是土地科学学术群体所认可和接受的关于土地科学的基本认知、研究思维和研究方法的体系,是土地科学学者开展土地科学研究时的共同"学术语言";土地科学学科范式框架是土地科学本体论、认识论和方法论的集成,以土地资源、土地管理、土地工程为本体论,以着眼于土地利用系统功能辩识的发展观、系统观和时空观为认识论,以质性与量化研究法、时空分析法、模型分析法、工程技术法等为方法论。研究结论:当前土地科学学科范式以一种隐性的潜意识方式存在并指引着大多数人的研究和实践,亟需应用科技哲学层面的范式理论,搭建中国土地科学学科范式框架,推进其范式显化、竞争、转换和发展。

关 键 词:土地管理  土地科学  学科范式  范式框架
收稿时间:2014-12-26
修稿时间:2015-01-20

Research on Framework Establishment of Discipline Paradigm of Land Science in China
YAN Jin-ming,XIA Fang-zhou.Research on Framework Establishment of Discipline Paradigm of Land Science in China[J].China Land Science,2015,29(2):30-37.
Authors:YAN Jin-ming  XIA Fang-zhou
Institution:1. School of Public Administration,Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China; 2. Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK
Abstract:Through the definition of the connotation of the scientific paradigm, the purpose of this article is to set up the framework of China land science paradigm and manifest the discipline paradigm of land science in China in order to promote the discipline construction and development. Methods of literature review, comparative analysis and case study are applied. The results show that discipline paradigm is a necessary precondition for land science to be a mature science discipline; the discipline paradigm of land science in China is a complicated system including basic cognitions, research thoughts and research methods which is widely accepted by academic groups and regarded as a common “academic language” while scholars carrying out scientific researches; a framework of discipline paradigm of land science in China is an integration of ontology, epistemology and methodology, taking land resources, land administration, land engineering as ontology, considering development concept, systematic perspective and space-time view focusing on function identification of land-use system as epistemology and regarding qualitative and quantitative method, patio-temporal analysis, model analysis and engineering technology as methodology. The conclusion of this article is that the current discipline paradigm of land science exists in a recessive way of subconsciousness, guiding most scholars’ research, and there is an urgent need to apply paradigm theories in philosophy of scientific practice to establish a framework of discipline paradigm of land science in China, promoting recessive discipline paradigm to manifest, compete, convert and develop to a new stage constantly.
Keywords:land administration  land science  discipline paradigm  paradigm framework
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国土地科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国土地科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号