首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Towards understanding and resolving the conflict related to the Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) conservation with participatory management planning
Institution:1. Szent István University, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Páter Károly u. 1., Gödöll? H-2100, Hungary;2. Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG), Rómer Flóris u. 38., Budapest H-1024, Hungary;3. MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Alkotmány u. 2-4., Vácrátót H-2163, Hungary;4. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development, Unit of Environmental Communication, Ulls väg 27, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden;1. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Uruguay 151, 6300 Santa Rosa, Argentina;2. Cátedra de Anatomía Comparada, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Calle 64 s/n (entre diag. 113 y calle 120), 1900 La Plata, Argentina;3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina;4. Centro para el Estudio y Conservación de las Aves Rapaces en Argentina (CECARA), Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Avda. Uruguay 151, 6300 Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina;5. The Peregrine Fund, 5668 West Flying Hawk Lane, Boise, ID 83709, USA;1. Department of Cartography, Trier University, D-54286 Trier, Germany;2. Restoration Ecology, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, D-85354 Freising, Germany;3. Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany;4. Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, D-85354 Freising, Germany;5. Department of Ornithology, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya;1. School of Life Science, Changchun Normal University, Changchun 130032, China;2. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou 466000, China;3. Key Laboratory of Grain and Oil Processing of Jilin Province, Jilin Business and Technology College, Changchun 130507, China;1. Attorney Advisor, U.S. Department of Labor, United States;2. Okan University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Turkey;1. College of Life and Sciences, Yantai Univeristy, Yantai Shandong, China;2. Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai Shandong, China;3. Hainan Key Laboratory for Herpetological Research, Qiongzhou University, Sanya Hainan, China;4. College of Life and Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, China
Abstract:Conflicts often arise in relation to the conservation of protected predator species. If stakeholders are well defined and involved in participatory processes, their views and perceptions can be incorporated and steps can be made towards resolving such conflicts. In this paper, a case from Hungary is presented. In this case, a participatory management planning process was initiated in the Jászság Special Protection Area of European importance (SPA), within the frame of a LIFE+ project focusing on the conservation of the Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca). It provided a good opportunity to address a complex conflict situation between nature conservationists, game managers and farmers. We identified structural conflicts such as contradictions between direct agricultural payments and nature conservation goals, conflicts related to different views of the main influencing factors, relational problems between various stakeholders, and even differences in value orientation. The participatory management planning process was successful in clarifying the conflict situation and making productive steps toward a common understanding and resolution. Besides the mutually agreed conservation measures, the establishment of an administrative and financial incentive such as the high nature value area (HNVA) scheme proved to be an especially important factor for mitigating the conflict. It also contributed to a more successful realisation of nature conservation objectives in an area dominated by private land owners. However, continued interaction and cooperation are needed to stabilise this progress. Our paper also shows that stakeholder involvement in conservation management planning can transcend the strategic dimension of participation, and address broader common values besides the interests of land user groups.
Keywords:Conservation conflict  Central and Eastern Europe  Conflict resolution  Eastern Imperial Eagle  Hungary  Participatory planning  Stakeholder involvement
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号