The ethics of lottery advertising: Issues and evidence

After a discussion of the evolution and criticisms of state run lotteries, this article examines the ethics of lottery advertising. A discussion of the appeals used by lottery advertisers is followed by evidence concerning the impact of expected value information on lottery purchase intentions. Findings point toward less emphasis on the lottery as a solution to financial and job problems and more emphasis on information about the actual value of a lottery bet. Using accepted standards from the marketing literature, lottery advertising is found to be deceptive.Shaheen Borna is Professor of Marketing at Ball State University. He has a DBA. His articles have appeared in theJournal of Business Ethics, Journal of Health Care Marketing, British Journal of Criminology, Journal of Accountancy, Akron Business and Economic Review, andProceedings of the American Marketing Associations.James M. Stearns is Associate Professor of Marketing at Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. Dr. Stearns is co-author ofThe Integration of Ethics into the Marketing Curriculum: An Educator's Guide andMarketing Ethics: An Annotated Bibliography. He is co-editor ofReadings in Marketing Ethics. Dr. Stearns' current research interests are the use and portrayal of the elderly in advertising, ethical and unethical behavior in academe, and the impact of technology on marketing curriculum.