| 美国国际贸易法院判定美国商务部对河北兴茂轮胎有限公司非公路用轮胎“双反”措施不当案评述 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龚柏华,孙灵瑶.美国国际贸易法院判定美国商务部对河北兴茂轮胎有限公司非公路用轮胎“双反”措施不当案评述[J].国际商务研究,2009,30(6). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龚柏华 孙灵瑶 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 上海WTO事务咨询中心
2. 复旦大学 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 上海社会哲学项目"上海鼓励企业出口措施与WTO补贴规则的合规性" |
| |
| 摘 要： | 美国进口商和中国出口商不满美国商务部对来自中国的某些非公路用轮胎实施反倾销和反补贴税的裁定,向美国国际贸易法院提出起诉。美国国际贸易法院裁定,美国法律没有明确规定反倾销税法是否可适用于非市场经济国家;本案中美国商务部做的"双反"裁定,在方法上不合理。本文在介绍该案的基本案情、归纳法院推理和判决的基础上,对该案涉及的法律问题做了简要评论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反倾销 反补贴 轮胎 非市场经济 |
Comment on the Case:GPX International Tire Corporation and Hebei Starbright Tire Co.,Ltd.,v. the Department of Commerce of United States for Its Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Determinations on Pneumatic Off-the-road Tires from the P.R. China |
| |
| GONG Bai-hua,SUN Ling-Yao.Comment on the Case:GPX International Tire Corporation and Hebei Starbright Tire Co.,Ltd.,v. the Department of Commerce of United States for Its Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Determinations on Pneumatic Off-the-road Tires from the P.R. China[J].International Business Research,2009,30(6). |
| |
| Authors: | GONG Bai-hua SUN Ling-Yao |
| |
| Institution: | GONG Bai-hua SUN Ling-Yao |
| |
| Abstract: | American domestic importer(GPX INTERNATIONAL TIRE CORPORATION ) and foreign producer/exporter( Hebei Starbright Tire Co.,Ltd.) of pneumatic off-the-road(OTR) tires from the People's Republic of China(PRC) filed complaints contesting the Department of Commerce's countervailing duty(CVD) and antidumping duty(AD) determinations and the International Trade Commission's(ITC's) injury determinations. The Court of International Trade,Jane A. Restani,Chief Judge,held that:(1) unfair trade statutes did not bar Depar... |
| |
| Keywords: | antidumping duty (AD) countervailing duty (CVD) tires non market economy (NME) |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
