试析特别保障措施条款的非公正性与双重危害性

2002年8月13日,印度针对中国出口的工业用缝纫机针,启动了全球第一起针对中国的特别保障措施调查。随后,欧盟、美国等发达国家相继对中国纺织品实施特别保障措施,限制中国纺织品的出口,最近势头更加猛烈。日本、美国、欧盟、加拿大、韩国、印度等国家纷纷制定或修订了相关的国内法,以备在必要时采取特别保障措施。近期,波兰、巴西、哥伦比亚、阿根廷、南非等发展中国家也纷纷做出决定,对中国纺织品实施特别保障措施。专门针对中国产品的特别保障措施的频繁实施,已越来越显示出“团伙化”迹象,中国纺织品出口陷入四面楚歌的境地。本文就中国“入世”后遭遇的这个“阻击手”——特别保障措施条款产生的背景、不公正性、对中国及实施国的危害性等问题进行研究、探讨。

Discussion on Unfair Nature and Duble Injurous Effect of Special Protection Measure

On Aug. 13, 2002,India began the investigation into special protection measure, pointing to China export of industrious sewing machine needles. Later on, EU, USA and other developed countries implemented special protection measures on China textile products export with the aim of limitation. Recently, this trend goes even fiercely. Japan, USA, EU, Canada, Korea South and India enacted or revised their connecting internal regulations for the same aim. Moreover, Poland, Brazil, Columbia, Argentina, South Africa and some other developing countries made the decision too. Such actions, showing the emerge of a collection nature, put China into a very difficult condition. After the accession of WTO, China has been facing the special protection measure clause as on trade attacker. Since, its background, unfair nature and the duble injurious effect to China and the implementing countries are the subjects to be studied.