Termination restrictions and investment in general training

Conditional separation payments efficiently increase firms’ investment in general training if the latter is not directly contractible. Since training is vested in the worker on separation, a firm's return to training is zero when a match ends or, more generally, when the firm's outside return is binding. Large enough conditional separation penalties ensure that, independently from outside opportunities, the ex post situation is one of bilateral monopoly. This allows the firm to capture a positive share of the return to the general component of training in all states of nature. A fixed wage contract and large enough separation penalties ensure that the firm's investment decision is fully efficient if training is general in Becker's (1964) sense.