A Field Study of the Review Process: Research Note |
| |
Authors: | PETER ROEBUCK KEN T. TROTMAN |
| |
Affiliation: | Peter;Roebuck is a Lecturer and Ken Trotman is a Professor in the School of Accounting, University of New South Wales. |
| |
Abstract: | Despite the stated importance of the audit review process in auditing standards and textbooks, research on the process itself is limited. This study provides evidence on the nature and purpose of the review process by examining the actual review notes prepared by managers of a Big-6 accounting firm. A sample of twenty-eight audit engagements resulting in 3,008 separate review notes was examined. The results suggest that quality control aspects appear to be the main focus of the review process. Review notes sometimes indicated the need to gather further information and/or undertake additional testing, and provided direct as well as indirect advice on the audit approach to subordinates. Few surprises resulted from the review process, and the review notes and approaches varied among managers. |
| |
Keywords: | Auditing Auditing procedures Reviews |
|