| 侦查阶段律师介入权的对比启示 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 秦红鹏.侦查阶段律师介入权的对比启示[J].山西经济管理干部学院学报,2003,11(4):68-69. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 秦红鹏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山西省太原市公安局万柏林分局,山西,太原,030024 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 根据刑事诉讼法规定，律师取得了在侦查阶段的介入权，确立了在侦查阶段的诉讼地位，为维护犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益起到了一定的作用，但刑事诉讼法对律师在侦查阶段的介入权规定的权限非常小，致使与国外律师在侦查阶段的介入权限相比有很大差异，进行中西比较可以给我们以启示。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侦查阶段 律师 介入权 刑事诉讼法 犯罪嫌疑人 中国 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-9101(2003)04-0068-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年10月22 |
During the Investigation Period of Attorney's Right to Intervene |
| |
| QIN Hong-peng.During the Investigation Period of Attorney''''s Right to Intervene[J].Journal of Shanxi Institute of Economic Management,2003,11(4):68-69. |
| |
| Authors: | QIN Hong-peng |
| |
| Abstract: | As stipulated in criminal proceedings code,the attorney obtains the right to intervene during the investigation period and then establishes his proceedings position.This is helpful to defend the legitimate interests of the criminal suspects,but the attorney's right to intervene during the investigation period is limited in criminal proceedings code.Being compared with external attorney's right to intervene during the investigation period,there are more different from them.We will get indications from comparison between China and West countries. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Investgation Period Right to Intervene Attorney The Criminal Suspects |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
