首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The concentration–stability controversy in banking: New evidence from the EU-25
Institution:1. Ivie. C/ Guardia Civil 22, Esc. 2, 1, 46020 Valencia, Spain;2. University of Valencia. Departamento de Análisis Economico, Edificio departamental Oriental, Avda. de los Naranjos, s/n. 46022 Valencia, Spain;1. School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University, 445 Swanston Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia;2. Department of Banking and Finance, Monash University, Caulfield Campus, Caulfield East, Victoria 3145, Australia
Abstract:This study explores whether the concentration–stability relation is affected by the level of analysis; i.e., bank-level versus country-level stability. The diverging results in the literature suggest that we may indeed expect differences between the two levels. With the z-score as the measure of financial stability, our theoretical analysis confirms that we may find such differences. Yet our empirical analysis for the EU-25 during the 1998–2014 period finds no economically significant effect of concentration on either the bank-level or the country-level z-score. The finding that concentration hardly affects stability at both levels of analysis is an indication of robustness in the empirical concentration–stability relation not previously established in the literature. This finding further suggests that neither supervisory restructuring, nor normal market-driven mergers, are likely to be substantially harmful to financial stability.
Keywords:Banking concentration  Financial stability  Market structure  Systemic risk
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号