首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Does prudential regulation contribute to effective measurement and management of interest rate risk? Evidence from Italian banks
Institution:1. Department of Business Studies, Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, SA, 84084, Italy;2. Department of Economics, Management and Institutions, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Cinthia, Complesso Monte S. Angelo, Napoli, NA 80126, Italy;3. Risk Management Department, Extrabanca, Via Pergolesi 2/A, Milano, MI 20124, Italy
Abstract:This paper contributes to prior literature and to the current debate concerning recent revisions of the regulatory approach to measuring bank exposure to interest rate risk in the banking book by focusing on assessment of the appropriate amount of capital banks should set aside against this specific risk. We first discuss how banks might develop internal measurement systems to model changes in interest rates and measure their exposure to interest rate risk that are more refined and effective than are regulatory methodologies. We then develop a backtesting framework to test the consistency of methodology results with actual bank risk exposure. Using a representative sample of Italian banks between 2006 and 2013, our empirical analysis supports the need to improve the standardized shock currently enforced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. It also provides useful insights for properly measuring the amount of capital to cover interest rate risk that is sufficient to ensure both financial system functioning and banking stability.
Keywords:Bank regulation  Interest rate risk  Monte Carlo simulations  Historical simulations  Backtesting
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号