首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Risk management,nonlinearity and aggressiveness in monetary policy: The case of the US Fed
Institution:1. University of Namur and CeReFiM, 8 Rempart de la Vierge, 5000 Namur, Belgium;2. European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;1. KAIST Business School, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea;2. Wooribank, Seoul, Republic of Korea;3. Dongguk Business School, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea;1. Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Economics, D-14195 Berlin, Germany;2. University of Regensburg, Department of Economics and Econometrics, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany;3. Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Germany;4. IOS Regensburg, Germany;1. College of Business, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA;2. Robert J. Trulaske Sr., College of Business, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA;1. DSB 302, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada;2. DSB A210, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
Abstract:We contribute to the empirical literature on the risk-management approach to monetary policy by estimating regime switching models where the strength of the response of monetary policy to macroeconomic conditions depends on the level of risk associated with the inflation outlook and risk in financial markets. Using quarterly data for the Greenspan period we find that: (i) risk in the inflation outlook and in financial markets are a more powerful driver of monetary policy regime changes than variables typically suggested in the literature, such as the level of inflation and the output gap; (ii) estimation of regime switching models shows that the response of the US Fed to the inflation outlook is invariant across policy regimes; (iii) however, in periods of high economic risk monetary policy tends to respond more aggressively to the output gap and the degree of inertia tends to be lower than in normal circumstances; and (iv) the US Fed is estimated to have responded aggressively to the output gap in the late 1980s and beginning of the 1990s, and in the late 1990s and early 2000s. These results are consistent with Mishkin (2008)’s view that in periods of high economic risk monetary authorities should respond aggressively to changes in macroeconomic conditions while the degree of inertia should be lower than in normal circumstances.
Keywords:US Fed  Monetary policy  Risk management  Smooth-transition regression model  Aggressiveness
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号