Bailout uncertainty in a microfounded general equilibrium model of the financial system |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Schools of Economics: Interdisciplinary Center, Tel-Aviv University and CEPR, Israel;2. Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, United States;1. Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, South Korea;2. School of Economics, Yonsei University, South Korea;1. University of Liège, HEC – Management School, Belgium;2. EDHEC Business School, Lille-Nice, France;3. Haute Ecole Fr. Ferrer, Brussels, Belgium;4. Maastricht University, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht, The Netherlands;5. Gambit Financial Solutions, Belgium;1. Department of Finance, Insurance and Business Law, Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;2. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Özyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey;3. Department of Finance and Business Law, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA;4. Department of Finance, Palumbo-Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This paper develops a micro-founded general equilibrium model of the financial system composed of ultimate borrowers, ultimate lenders and financial intermediaries. The model is used to investigate the impact of uncertainty about the likelihood of governmental bailouts on leverage, interest rates, the volume of defaults and the real economy. The distinction between risk and uncertainty is implemented by applying the multiple priors framework to beliefs about the probability of bailout.Results of the analysis include: (i) An unanticipated increase in bailout uncertainty raises interest rates, the volume of defaults in both the real and financial sectors and may lead to a total drying up of credit markets. (ii) Lower exante bailout uncertainty is conducive to higher leverage, which in turn raises moral hazard and makes the economy more vulnerable to expost increases in bailout uncertainty. (iii) Bailout uncertainty affects the likelihood of bubbles, the amplitude of booms and busts as well as the banking and the credit spreads. (iv) Higher bailout uncertainty is associated with higher returns’ variability in diversified portfolios and higher systemic risks, (v) Pre-crisis expansionary monetary policy reinforces those effects by inducing higher aggregate leverage levels. (vi) The larger the change in bailout uncertainty and the change in aversion to this uncertainty, the stronger the pre-crisis buildup and the deeper the ensuing crisis.A central policy implication of the analysis is that the vaguest is bailout policy prior to a crisis, the lower is the magnitude of investments destroyed or missed due to errors in evaluating bailout and other intervention policies. On the other hand, the clearer is bailout policy upon the eruption of a crisis, the smaller the contraction of credit and the destruction of investment activity. |
| |
Keywords: | Risk Uncertainty Lehman’s default Leverage Financial intermediaries Bailouts Duration mismatches G01 G11 G2 G18 E3 E4 E5 E6 D81 D83 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|