An analysis of the impact of the self-sufficiency project on wages |
| |
Authors: | Jeffrey Zabel Saul Schwartz Stephen Donald |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Economics Department, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA 2. School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada 3. Economics Department, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | We measure the impact of the Self-Sufficiency Project (a randomized welfare-to-work experiment in Canada; henceforth, SSP) on relative wage progression. SSP provided a generous 3-year earnings supplement to treatment group members who found a full-time job within a year of the start of the experiment (take-up group). We estimate the treatment on the treated for two sub-groups of the take-up group: the incentivized and non-incentivized groups. Using an econometric model of wage determination, we find evidence of large and significant relative wage progression of approximately 9 percentage points during the 3-year supplement period for the incentivized group. The impact for the non-incentivized group is much smaller (at most 3 percentage points). There is also some limited information that the non-incentivized group in New Brunswick and the incentivized groups in both New Brunswick and British Columbia continued to work more after the 3-year supplement period ended. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|