The economic effects of restrictions on government budget deficits: imperfect private credit markets |
| |
Authors: | Christian Ghiglino Karl Shell |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Economics, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK (e-mail: c.ghiglino@qmul.ac.uk) , GB;(2) Department of Economics, 402 Uris Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-7601, USA (e-mail: ks22@cornell.edu) , US |
| |
Abstract: | Summary. The present paper is an extension of Ghiglino and Shell [7] to the case of imperfect consumer credit markets. We show that with constraints on individual credit and only anonymous (i.e., non-personalized) lump-sum taxes, strong (or “global”) irrelevance of government budget deficits is not possible, and weak (or “local”) irrelevance can hold only in very special situations. This is in sharp contrast to the result for perfect credit markets. With credit constraints and anonymous consumption taxes, weak irrelevance holds if the number of tax instruments is sufficiently large and at least one consumer's credit constraint is not binding. This is an extension of the result for perfect credit markets. Received: August 28, 2001; revised version: March 25, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" We thank Todd Keister, Bruce Smith, and two referees for helpful comments. Correspondence to: C. Ghiglino |
| |
Keywords: | and Phrases: Balanced-budget amendment Consumption taxes Credit constraints Government budget deficit irrelevance Lump-sum taxes Overlapping generations. |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|