Should reciprocity be a part of the UNCITRAL Model Cross-Border Insolvency Law? |
| |
Authors: | Keith D. Yamauchi |
| |
Affiliation: | MFH4315, University of Calgary, Faculty of Law, Murray Fraser Hall, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | In 1997, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law adopted a Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency. Since then, many countries have passed it or a revised version of it. In many cases, the adopting country wrestled with the issue of whether to include a reciprocity provision in its version. Some have included such a provision, others have not. The inclusion of a reciprocity provision is not consistent. This article discusses the concept and argues that a reciprocity provision could be detrimental to the operation of the Model Law and prejudicial to the parties; especially those in the country whose legislation includes such a provision. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|