Information distortion and competitive remedies in government transfer programs: The case of ethanol |
| |
Authors: | Ronald N Johnson Gary D Libecap |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Agricultural Economics & Economics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA (e-mail: uaerj@montana.edu) , US;(2) Department of Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA , US;(3) National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA (e-mail: glibecap@bpa.arizona.edu) , US |
| |
Abstract: | This paper reconsiders the analogy between competitive markets and the political process that is central to much of the literature
on the efficiency of government transfers. The key problem is that property rights in politics are much less well defined
than they are in competitive markets. As the paper outlines, obtaining accurate information about the benefits and costs of
transfers is likely to be much more difficult than envisioned in the literature. Investigators, as well as general voters,
often must rely on the government and competing parties for provision of information about underlying program parameters and
functional relationships. We argue that politicians and the affected interest groups have incentives to limit and distort
the information that is released to voters and that political competition is unlikely to be an effective counter. In developing
the argument, a theoretical framework is provided and applied in a case study of the ethanol transfer. The documented efforts
to disguise the actual costs and benefits of the program are important for gaining a broader understanding of the functioning
and costs of government transfers in the economy. |
| |
Keywords: | : efficiency government information ethanol transfers |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|