Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder identification |
| |
Authors: | John Kaler |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) University of Plymouth Business School, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | Definitions of what it is to be a stakeholder are divided into "claimant" definitions requiring some sort of claim on the services of a business, "influencer" definitions requiring only a capacity to influence the workings of the business, and "combinatory" definitions allowing for either or both of these requirements. It is argued that for the purposes of business ethics, stakeholding has to be about improving the moral conduct of businesses by directing them at serving more than just the interests of owners. On that basis, influencer definitions are eliminated on the grounds that they only concern morally neutral strategic considerations and combinatory definitions on the grounds that the combining of ethical and strategic considerations they promise can be less confusingly achieved through an exclusively claimant definition. It is concluded that for the purposes of business ethics, stakeholders are claimants towards whom businesses owe perfect or imperfect moral duties beyond those generally owed to people at large. |
| |
Keywords: | business ethics claimants definitions identification influencers morality stakeholders strategy |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|